Pricey Quentin,
I learn considered one of your latest letters from a public-school trainer whose boyfriend wanted half the cost of a vacation when they broke up. He works on Wall Avenue.
This dropped at thoughts my ex demanding that I pay half of our daughter’s uncovered medical invoice. He was making about 3 times what I do.
So right here’s my query: When there’s an enormous disparity in pay — is 50% of dinner, mortgage, medical payments, trip, utilities and different shared bills justified?
Wouldn’t a extra equitable resolution be primarily based on earnings? Like if I make $50,000 and my accomplice makes $150,000, wouldn’t an equitable association be for me to pay 25%?
I do know now that cash must be a frank and sensible dialogue in any state of affairs, however I’m questioning what your take is on this.
Mom Left Holding the Invoice
Pricey Rebecca,
There’s not often such a factor as “honest” in a breakup, particularly relating to funds.
If one ex is paying alimony and youngster help, they might go away the wedding with years of lingering resentments over how a lot they must pay their ex. For a pair that had a baby collectively, and didn’t get married, the difficulty is extra difficult however the absent guardian is compelled by the regulation to pay youngster help. In that case, youngster help pertains to the accountability for elevating a baby.
For fogeys who by no means married, it’s tougher to argue that it is best to solely pay medical payments in your youngster in proportion to your incomes. Normally, you’d leverage your youngster help to pay for such bills and/or — when applicable — ask your former accomplice to pay their share. In case you have been married and divorced, the divorce decree ought to specify how a lot cash every former partner ought to pay for his or her youngster’s schooling, residing bills and medical payments.
Katie Carter, a divorce legal professional with the Hofheimer Household Legislation Agency in Virginia, has opinions on this problem: “In numerous agreements, I discover that opposing counsel (particularly when the husband earns extra) will attempt to embody that the events will break up the unreimbursed medical bills 50/50,” she writes. “However that’s not the regulation. The regulation says that the events will break up unreimbursed medical bills professional rata – that’s, proportionally, primarily based on their incomes.”
Backside line: “If he earns 80% of the earnings, he pays 80% of the unreimbursed medical bills, she provides. “I’d solely ever conform to a 50/50 break up if the events’ incomes have been equal, or if a pro-rata break up would imply that my shopper would pay extra of the bills. Once more, it’s essential to have a look at these numbers. Even when the excellence is simply 60/40, it could make an enormous distinction if there’s (heaven forbid!) a catastrophic accident or a foul analysis of some sort.”
I’d hate to consider any marriage the place a better incomes partner nickel-and-dimed their accomplice, forcing them to cough up 50% of a trip or dinner, however these are all good conversations to have forward of time. If each companions are working and you’ll afford a bigger house as a result of the husband or spouse earns 3 times their partner’s wage, it might appear churlish to count on each companions to separate the mortgage or dinner out 50/50. However some individuals like to depend!
You can e mail The Moneyist with any monetary and moral questions at qfottrell@marketwatch.com, and comply with Quentin Fottrell on Twitter.
Take a look at the Moneyist private Facebook group, the place we search for solutions to life’s thorniest cash points. Readers write in to me with all types of dilemmas. Put up your questions, inform me what you need to know extra about, or weigh in on the most recent Moneyist columns.
The Moneyist regrets he can’t reply to questions individually.
Extra from Quentin Fottrell:
